2 Comments
User's avatar
Neural Foundry's avatar

The tension between midtier manufacturers is spot on. Working in product sourcing I saw this exact pattern where companies big enough to damage supply chains but too small to absorb R&D costs into alternatives end up defaulting to whatever wood is cheapest today, no questions asked. The threshold idea is interesting because it shifts sustainablity from being a competitive disadvantage into table stakes, which is really the only way systemic change happens. I do wonder though if implementation would need regional variation since forestry managment and supply chain complexity differ wildly by market.

Expand full comment
Ron Watson's avatar

This is brilliant! You’re pointing to the core constraint: companies large enough to influence supply chains, yet too small to absorb R&D risk. That’s where sustainability breaks down. I believe that a threshold model works because it turns responsible sourcing into table stakes, not a cost penalty. But implementation can’t be uniform. Forestry management, regulatory oversight, and supply-chain complexity vary dramatically by region, so thresholds would need localized standards to drive real, scalable change.

Expand full comment